On Monday 04 April 2005 20:39, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ok, I'm writing the patch. Use the attached one on 2.6.11 (and/or -bs1),
> nor on 2.6.9!
> I'm writing a better one for merge, which works well also for AMD64 users
> (which can't use aes-i586).
Just a note - the patch I sent yesterday in a hurry
On Monday 04 April 2005 03:22, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> Am 01.04.2005 um 21:03 schrieb Blaisorblade:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2005 00:37, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> how to build cryptoloop support in 2.6.9-bs7 ?
> >
> > Well, cryptoloop should work without problem, the right question i
Am 01.04.2005 um 21:03 schrieb Blaisorblade:
On Thursday 31 March 2005 00:37, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
Hi,
how to build cryptoloop support in 2.6.9-bs7 ?
Well, cryptoloop should work without problem, the right question is
for
aes-i586, right?
not completely, because: in menuconfig the cryptoloop opt
On Thursday 31 March 2005 00:37, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how to build cryptoloop support in 2.6.9-bs7 ?
Well, cryptoloop should work without problem, the right question is for
aes-i586, right?
> if I build uml I see things like "-U__i386__ -Ui386 -D__arch_um__
> -DSUBARCH="i386""
>
> is t
Hi,
how to build cryptoloop support in 2.6.9-bs7 ?
if I build uml I see things like "-U__i386__ -Ui386 -D__arch_um__
-DSUBARCH="i386""
is the uml binary not optimized for i686 ? How to do that ?
is it possible to use the aes-i586 (asm) implementation under uml ?
thank you for your response.
/seb
