Am Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:10:07 +0200
schrieb Toralf Förster :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/24/2012 09:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 24.09.2012 21:23, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> >> On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>
> >>> Does the attached
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2012 09:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 24.09.2012 21:23, schrieb Toralf Förster:
>> On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>>
>>> Thanks, //richard
>>
>> Seems, that th
Am 24.09.2012 21:23, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
>> Thanks, //richard
>
> Seems, that this patch won't make it into 3.6, or ?
> (or is it only a work around of an underlying issue ?)
It will.
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
> Thanks, //richard
>
Seems, that this patch won't make it into 3.6, or ?
(or is it only a work around of an underlying issue ?)
- --
MfG/Sincer
Am 10.09.2012 21:02, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
> yes
> :-)
Good.
>
>
> BTW and now to a complete different thing :
> Why is the kernel option CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL not selectable for
> UM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
yes
:-)
BTW and now to a complete different thing :
Why is the kernel option CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL not selectable for
UML ?
- --
MfG/Since
Am 10.09.2012 19:37, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/10/2012 04:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
>>> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>>>
semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2012 04:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
>> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>>
>>> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 327
Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>
>> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 32769 semctl(32769, 0,
>> IPC_64|SETVAL, 0xbfa05178) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>> semctl(32769, 0, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>
> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 32769 semctl(32769, 0,
> IPC_64|SETVAL, 0xbfa05178) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> semctl(32769, 0, IPC_6
Am 09.09.2012 18:36, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/09/2012 02:48 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Toralf Förster
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> with current git tree 3.6-rc5 I cannot longer start apache2 at a
>>> UML image with an unstable Gentoo Linux.
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with current git tree 3.6-rc5 I cannot longer start apache2 at a
> UML image with an unstable Gentoo Linux.
>
> The apache error log gives :
>
> [Sun Sep 09 11:53:25.225818 2012] [core:emerg] [pid 1054:tid 1078662848]
> (22)Invalid a
Hi,
with current git tree 3.6-rc5 I cannot longer start apache2 at a
UML image with an unstable Gentoo Linux.
The apache error log gives :
[Sun Sep 09 11:53:25.225818 2012] [core:emerg] [pid 1054:tid 1078662848]
(22)Invalid argument: AH00023: Couldn't create the rewrite-map mutex
AH00016: Config
13 matches
Mail list logo