[uml-user] about mem=nM it works thanks for jason

2006-06-29 Thread paul john
because i haven't received a mail but read this info from maillist achieve, so i forward it to list again. maybe many people doesn't received this mail   it works , and what's the meaning of that commands ?     [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:> if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=2

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-28 Thread Nix
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jeff Dike mused: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:36:19AM +0100, Nix wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, paul john uttered the following: >> > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs >> > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" >> >> Do you have at least

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-28 Thread paul john
still not work ,  can with 128 ,can't with 256 2006/6/28, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:29:21AM +0800, paul john wrote:> strange that . tried again from mem=64M it's ok . and tried 512M again,works > .  tried again . ok.>> and now it's ok .>> thanks , but i wonder why st

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:29:21AM +0800, paul john wrote: > strange that . tried again from mem=64M it's ok . and tried 512M again,works > . tried again . ok. > > and now it's ok . > > thanks , but i wonder why still sometimes it can't start. When it doesn't start, look at /dev/shm (or /tmp) a

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:36:19AM +0100, Nix wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, paul john uttered the following: > > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs > > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" > > Do you have at least 256Mb of space free in /dev/shm? > > (In ol

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:30:22PM +, Jason Lunz wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs > > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" > > Does it work if you do this: > > # sysctl -w kernel.randomize_va_space=0 >

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread paul john
and now it doesn't work.    looks something is not stable. 2006/6/28, paul john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /   ext3    defaults    1 1LABEL=/boot /boot   ex

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread paul john
# This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /   ext3    defaults    1 1LABEL=/boot /boot   ext3    defaults    1 2 none    /dev/pts    devpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0no

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Nix
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, paul john uttered the following: > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" Do you have at least 256Mb of space free in /dev/shm? (In older UMLs, pre-2.6.17, you'll need to make sure /tmp has enough room

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Jason Lunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" Does it work if you do this: # sysctl -w kernel.randomize_va_space=0 # sysctl -w vm.max_map_count=262144 If so, you can put these settigns i

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:48:23AM +0800, paul john wrote: > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" What version of UML? Jeff Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit

[uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-27 Thread paul john
i met a strange prob.   if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs there .report "mount devfs on /dev"   some troubling shooting said that , modified the makefile of uml kernel and recompile it . i tried this ,but it doesn't work .   please some one give advice .th