On 14/10/2007, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:49:00PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> > if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
> > uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
>
> You could just get 2.6.23 and be done with it.
2.6.23 kernel sources, or uml patch
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:49:00PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
> uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
You could just get 2.6.23 and be done with it.
> Is it not ncessary to patch it, in order to have a guest kernel,
> either on x86_64 and on i3
For example,
if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
Is it not ncessary to patch it, in order to have a guest kernel,
either on x86_64 and on i386 architectures?
Flavio
On 14/10/2007, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 200
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> 2) patch your UML kernel with the uml-patch
What patch? x86_64 needs no more patching than i386.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
ge du 14/10/07 11:18
> > De : "Flavio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > A : user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [uml-user] UML on x86_64
> >
> > The same problem here.
> > Unfortunately skas3 mode isn't yet supported for
The same problem here.
Unfortunately skas3 mode isn't yet supported for x86_64 arch.
You can patch the host kernel using skas3 patch but it won't work.
Skas0 mode will works instead. It is not properly the same, but is
better than the old tt-mode.
As regard guests, you can patch them all. I think
Hi,
I use UML on several systems (i386 arch) since years. Now, I want to use it on
x86_64 systems.
My questions :
- does skas patch work fine on x86_64 ?
- idem for guest path ?
Cheers.
Jean-Michel Caricand
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Créez votre adresse électronique [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to compile UML on a x86_64 box.
When compiling, I first ran into the problem of "RAX" and "ORIG_RAX"
being undeclared in "arch/um/include/sysdep-x86_64/ptrace_user.h".
This was easy, but the next problem occurred in
"arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c: In function `sys_ptrace':
arch/um/kernel/pt
I have been trying to compile UML on a Xeon EM64T test box we have, but
have been unable to get any kernel compiled. I have tried 2.6.10,
2.6.11, 2.6.4 with the x86_64 patch, and 2.4.25 with the x86_64 patch.
Has anybody else had any luck with this? Or does anyone have a .config
file they would
