Blaisorblade wrote:
>snip<
I.e.? You mean the net is under-used?
Using synchronous UBD (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC)? That would generate the
slowdown.
Turning it off and replacing ubd0= with ubd0s= gives the same safety
without this big artificial slowdown (search for "bonnie++" in the
archives
On Thursday 16 June 2005 08:07, Dan Lund wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >On Thursday 16 June 2005 02:27, Dan Lund wrote:
> >>I'm having a problem that I need a little advice on.
> >>I'm running a guest kernel 2.4.31 on a 2.6.11 host with the skas3v8
> >>patch installed.
> >>The host is a IBM xSerie
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2005 02:27, Dan Lund wrote:
I'm having a problem that I need a little advice on.
I'm running a guest kernel 2.4.31 on a 2.6.11 host with the skas3v8
patch installed.
The host is a IBM xSeries 335 with a 2.8 Ghz dual processor, 4Gb of RAM
installed.
I'
On Thursday 16 June 2005 02:27, Dan Lund wrote:
> I'm having a problem that I need a little advice on.
> I'm running a guest kernel 2.4.31 on a 2.6.11 host with the skas3v8
> patch installed.
> The host is a IBM xSeries 335 with a 2.8 Ghz dual processor, 4Gb of RAM
> installed.
>
> I'm running a tm
I'm having a problem that I need a little advice on.
I'm running a guest kernel 2.4.31 on a 2.6.11 host with the skas3v8
patch installed.
The host is a IBM xSeries 335 with a 2.8 Ghz dual processor, 4Gb of RAM
installed.
I'm running a tmpfs of 256mb, and a memlimit of 256mb on the instance.
He
