Re: [uml-user] UML 2.6.11 SMP issues

2005-05-25 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 20:18, Patrick Allison wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > Well, this particular error (the build one) should be fixed in -bs... for > > the SMP mode we'll work on it, however SMP support is not very maintained > > because it's supported for now only in TT mode, which is slowe

Re: [uml-user] UML 2.6.11 SMP issues

2005-05-25 Thread Patrick Allison
Blaisorblade wrote: Well, this particular error (the build one) should be fixed in -bs... for the SMP mode we'll work on it, however SMP support is not very maintained because it's supported for now only in TT mode, which is slower... i.e. with SKAS on the host you get better performances than

Re: [uml-user] UML 2.6.11 SMP issues

2005-05-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 23 May 2005 22:02, Patrick Allison wrote: > Hi all: > > I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel. > Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the > number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever). > Then I get > Checking f

Re: [uml-user] UML 2.6.11 SMP issues

2005-05-23 Thread Ian McDonald
On 24/05/05, Patrick Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all: > > I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel. > Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the > number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever). > I recall a list on

[uml-user] UML 2.6.11 SMP issues

2005-05-23 Thread Patrick Allison
Hi all: I'm having some problems with enabling SMP in a 2.6.11.8 UML kernel. Everything works fine (with only 1 CPU, of course) until I specify the number of CPUs on the command line via ncpus=4 (or whatever). Then I get Checking for /proc/mm...not found Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK