On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:26:18PM -0800, frank evans wrote:
> 1) Am I crazy, or does the UML just not want to do multicast?
UML doesn't care about multicast. I'd bet there's a missing route or
something.
> 2) Am I looking in all the right places in the uml_switch to watch the
> data, or did I
o lie on port = 0 than on INADDR_ANY(you'd at least need to be root to use a port < 1024, and I think port 0 is
invalid).------ Forwarded Message ------Subject: Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...Date: Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:09From: frank evans <
[EMAIL P
-- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...
Date: Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:09
From: frank evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HI UML'ers...
OK, I have another issue: I have a UML (linux-2
Hi UML'ers,
OK, NEVERMIND! It all works fine...I just can't type...
Best Regards,
Ben EvansOn 1/27/06, frank evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi UML'ers,
Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have another question:
1) I want to set up a UML with 3 ethernet ports
Hi UML'ers,
Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have another question:
1) I want to set up a UML with 3 ethernet ports - eth0, eth1, and
eth2 - each being connected to a separate virtual network. From
reading about the daemon, it seems I can get this done. I do
Yes, and another UML'er has pointed me to patches he used successfully to compile with gcc4. I'm going to give them a try...
On 1/27/06, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote:> I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE a
On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote:
> I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and that set
> it up correctly...
>
> Much thanks to all...
> Now I have another question:
> I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs, make,
> etc. If I
I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and that set it up correctly...
Much thanks to all...
Now I have another question:
I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs,
make, etc. If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3,
with a gcc3.4.2 e
On Friday 27 January 2006 01:25, saltytexan wrote:
> Yes, that is what I suspected as well...
> I believe the problem is that the kernel does not think IGMP is available.
> The error message occurs when the code tries to setsockopt on a socket
> declared to be an IGMP datagram socket. However, I
Yes, that is what I suspected as well...
I believe the problem is that the kernel does not think IGMP is available. The error message occurs when the code tries to setsockopt on a socket declared to be an
IGMP datagram socket. However, I see in my startup listing that the net protocols for TCP
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:00:26AM -0800, saltytexan wrote:
> PROBLEM: The way smcroute works, it establishes a daemon to handle MR
> requests and set up the routing tables. Part of that code necessarily sets
> up a UDP socket, and then sets an optioin on that socket for MRT_INIT. This
> causes
Hi UML Friends,
I have a particular situation I am trying to test using UML, but am having a problem...
1) I want to set up a test of Static Multicast Routing using UML. The idea is to have one UML instance running SMCRoute to implement a Static Multicast Router. Input to that UML would be o
12 matches
Mail list logo
