Le Vendredi, 10 Juin 2011 15:12:00 -0500,
clow...@clownix.net a écrit :
> I have made machines with make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 on debian squeeze
> and on ubuntu natty with kernel 2.6.39 but I am sure that the
> 2.6.39.1 works also.
> You can try the machines at clownix.net.
> Also in the downloadab
Hello Ianas,
I have made machines with make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 on debian squeeze and
on ubuntu natty with kernel 2.6.39 but I am sure that the 2.6.39.1 works
also.
You can try the machines at clownix.net.
Also in the downloadable cloonix there are scripts to help create uml
machines, kernel and f
Le Samedi, 11 Juin 2011 01:39:12 +0700,
Antoine Martin a écrit :
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
Make I take the opportunity to ask which kernel would be currently
recommended to use ?
Thanks again.
--
EditLive Enterprise
Le Samedi, 11 Juin 2011 01:39:12 +0700,
Antoine Martin a écrit :
> > x86_64 machine to run UML with a 32-bit UML file system ? I
> > haven't seen any kernel option that allows to specify both ARCH
> > 'um' *and* a 32-bit arch to allow compiling on a x86_64 machine.
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
On 06/11/2011 01:33 AM, lanas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if the only way to run a 32-bit UML on a x86_64
> is to compile the UML kernel (ARCH=um) on a 32 bit machine (virtual
> machine for instance) and then use that kernel on the x86_64 machine to
> run UML with a 32-bit UML file
Hello,
I would like to know if the only way to run a 32-bit UML on a x86_64
is to compile the UML kernel (ARCH=um) on a 32 bit machine (virtual
machine for instance) and then use that kernel on the x86_64 machine to
run UML with a 32-bit UML file system ? I haven't seen any kernel
option that a
