Re: [uml-user] Re: strace(1) under 2.4.x

2005-03-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:32, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:59:33PM +, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > > I'm observing strace(1) behaving oddly under recent 2.4.x > > versions. Under 2.4.27 with uml-patch-2.4.27-1 and strace > > 4.5.8, we get: > > [...] > > > Has anyone e

[uml-user] Re: strace(1) under 2.4.x

2005-03-23 Thread Chris Lightfoot
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:59:33PM +, Chris Lightfoot wrote: > I'm observing strace(1) behaving oddly under recent 2.4.x > versions. Under 2.4.27 with uml-patch-2.4.27-1 and strace > 4.5.8, we get: [...] > Has anyone else observed this and looked into it in more > detail? It looks as if th