Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-08 Thread Antoine Martin
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 17:53 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2005 19:38, Antoine Martin wrote: > > Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice > > within a short period of time. > > > I captured the messages from a serial > > console the second time > Would

Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-08 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 06 May 2005 17:09, Antoine Martin wrote: > > The 64-bit guest boots into existing 32-bit root_fs without problems, I > > will rebuild all my 64-bit guests and let you know how this goes. > > Actually, I got mixed up, the 64-bit filesystems worked but the 32-bit > didn't. I couldn't find a

Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-08 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 06 May 2005 19:38, Antoine Martin wrote: > Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice > within a short period of time. > I captured the messages from a serial > console the second time Would you check that you haven't got an hardware problem? The stack trace

Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-06 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:38:38PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice > within a short period of time. I captured the messages from a serial > console the second time (it seems that you only need to generate some > load to trigger t

Re: [uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-06 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:09:01PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > Actually, I got mixed up, the 64-bit filesystems worked but the 32-bit > didn't. I couldn't find any option to allow support for 32-bit binaries, > has it been removed? Does this mean that we need pure 64-bit fs? I was wondering abo

[uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-06 Thread Antoine Martin
Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice within a short period of time. I captured the messages from a serial console the second time (it seems that you only need to generate some load to trigger this bug - I was compiling some code with gcc): Host: Linux x86_64 2.6.1

[uml-user] Re: UML/x86_64

2005-05-06 Thread Antoine Martin
> The 64-bit guest boots into existing 32-bit root_fs without problems, I > will rebuild all my 64-bit guests and let you know how this goes. Actually, I got mixed up, the 64-bit filesystems worked but the 32-bit didn't. I couldn't find any option to allow support for 32-bit binaries, has it been r