[uml-user] Re: Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.10 - 2.6.11.7)

Hi, I'm also fight with the "load-avg" issue. I found some mails regarding this on the mailing list - here something from my side about this... On Tuesday 19 April 2005 Blaisorblade wrote: > The patch I suggested to Chris was named, in the patch, > "update-process-times", however the name in my t

[uml-user] Re: Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.10 - 2.6.11.7)

Hi, I'm also fight with the "load-avg" issue. I found some mails regarding this on the mailing list - here something from my side about this... On Tuesday 19 April 2005 Blaisorblade wrote: The patch I suggested to Chris was named, in the patch, "update-process-times", however the name in my tree wa