Hello,
I've been running some benchmarks on UML instances running inside
Amazon EC2 instances. Specifically, I've been running the Ruby on
Rails test suite. My experience so far shows the UML instance to be
running between 5 and 10 times slower than running on the bare EC2
instance.
I know that
005 12:48 PM
To: Wang, Chip
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-user] Performance issue with 2.6.9
Any chance you still have cron running? It might kick in after an hour
or so.
On 29/11/05, Wang, Chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have b
Any chance you still have cron running? It might kick in after an hour or so.
On 29/11/05, Wang, Chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been experiencing some performance problems with my UML setup.
> I had six guests running. The performance was very good immediately after
> the boot.
Hi,
I have been
experiencing some performance problems with my UML setup.
I had six guests
running. The performance was very good immediately after the boot. However, if I
leave them running for an hour or so, they all become very sluggish.
Response to my typing in the virtual consoles bec
On Saturday 20 August 2005 15:39, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 15:16 schrieb Markus Hochholdinger:
> > Uhm, i now have to test this with async ubd devices because i had the
> > sync option for ubd on.
About the host FS, I've seen a paper from LinuxSymposium2005
Hi,
Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 15:16 schrieb Markus Hochholdinger:
> Uhm, i now have to test this with async ubd devices because i had the sync
> option for ubd on.
ok, async ubd gets 18-20MB/s. So ubd to a partition is twice faster!
Can anybody tell me if async ubd to a partition is save e.g.
Hi,
Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 06:55 schrieb Jason Clark:
> I run on real block devices (in my case, linux software RAID 1 devices)
> for each of my umls. Im currently running 4 UMLS on a box, each with their
> own RAID 1 md device. Works out pretty well, the performance is good and
> the host s
I run on real block devices (in my case, linux software RAID 1 devices)
for each of my umls. Im currently running 4 UMLS on a box, each with their
own RAID 1 md device. Works out pretty well, the performance is good and
the host system doesnt get anywhere near as bogged down when a guest does
Hi,
can anybody tell me which is the best performing fs for a running uml? How
much of the performce of the disks can i get through to the uml?
I tried ubd files on a ext3 filesystem on the host. But the performance was
very bad. Then i tried nfs and it performs better and it has the advantages
