On Thursday 14 April 2005 20:36, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote:
> > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested
> > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that
> > and reply to the list with th
Hello,
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote:
> This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested
> turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that
> and reply to the list with the results?
I now also tried 2.6.10 with the same result (1.0 Lo
Hello All,
> On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote:
> > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested
> > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that
> > and reply to the list with the results?
> >
sorry, just nuke my previous post :
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote:
> This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested
> turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that
> and reply to the list with the results?
>
> Regards, Peter
>
Thanks Peter
Just tried
# CONFIG_UM
This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested
turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that
and reply to the list with the results?
Regards, Peter
Daniel Tombeil wrote:
Hello Dave,
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 10:24 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
Hi
My load
Hello Dave,
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 10:24 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
> Hi
>
> My loadav (using kernel 2.6.9 and above) in my guest kernels is always
> at least 1.0... does anyone else get this?
yes, itÂs the same here. ksoftirqd is always runable.
top - 21:12:12 up 4 min, 1 user, load average:
Hi
My loadav (using kernel 2.6.9 and above) in my guest kernels is always
at least 1.0... does anyone else get this?
top - 10:20:34 up 2:21, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 0.92
Tasks: 46 total, 2 running, 44 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% i
