Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-11 Thread John M Flinchbaugh
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:25:16PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: > What happens if you export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 before running > your java > widget? i've tried that before, and just tried it again. it doesn't help the problem of the one java thread sucking up max cpu and becoming nonresponsive.

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread Net Llama!
What happens if you export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 before running your java widget? On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Peter wrote: > Your report is with a 1.3 JDK. I'd suggest if you want to use Java, use > a 1.4.2 JDK. They are pretty solid. > > The problem I am getting does not result in any processes cras

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread Peter
Your report is with a 1.3 JDK. I'd suggest if you want to use Java, use a 1.4.2 JDK. They are pretty solid. The problem I am getting does not result in any processes crashing. It just results in maxed out CPU. Regards, Peter http://rimuhosting.com McGroarty wrote: [Snip much discussion of Ja

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread Peter
Hi. Sorry about not posting the version info. I'm seeing the problems on various kernels. UML kernels of 2.4.27 and 2.6.9-bb4 (which seems to work very well, btw). Skas kernels of 2.6.8.1 + skas3-v7. The host and guest distro I've noticed this on are White Box Enterprise Linux 3. They repor

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread McGroarty
[Snip much discussion of Java errors] I installed Java, curious to see if I would have these same problems. Curiously, even just running the java command fails about one time in three. When it fails, it looks like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/version Linux version 2.4.27-1um ([EMAIL PROTE

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 10 January 2005 05:33, Peter wrote: > I have some users running 1.5 Java VMs. They run for a bit. Then seem > to get 'locked up'. > > The process maxes out the UML CPU. They do not respond to a kill -3 > (which normally causes a Java stack trace to be output). The process > does not o

Re: [uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-10 Thread John M Flinchbaugh
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:33:30PM +1300, Peter wrote: > I have some users running 1.5 Java VMs. They run for a bit. Then > seem > to get 'locked up'. > The process maxes out the UML CPU. They do not respond to a kill > -3 > (which normally causes a Java stack trace to be output). The > pr

[uml-user] JDK1.5 CPU Problems

2005-01-09 Thread Peter
I have some users running 1.5 Java VMs. They run for a bit. Then seem to get 'locked up'. The process maxes out the UML CPU. They do not respond to a kill -3 (which normally causes a Java stack trace to be output). The process does not output anything when I strace it (after it locks up).