On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:10, Flavio wrote:
> 2006/10/14, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Since UML has been integrated in mainline, it is not any more correct to
> > talk
> > about "UML patch" - that's misleading for people (including Jeff Dike).
>
> I'm sorry, probably you misunderstoo
2006/10/14, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Since UML has been integrated in mainline, it is not any more correct to talkabout "UML patch" - that's misleading for people (including Jeff Dike).I'm sorry, probably you misunderstood me. I didn't want to mislead anyone.
I simply want to explain what
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:41, Flavio wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm writing my degree thesis. Part of it, deal with UML and expecially of
> skas and uml patches.
Since UML has been integrated in mainline, it is not any more correct to talk
about "UML patch" - that's misleading for people (includi
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:41:21PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> I'm writing my degree thesis. Part of it, deal with UML and expecially of
> skas and uml patches.
> I need a detailed decription of both patches, eg. what do they works for,
> how, etc...
> Could you write for me a detailed description for b
Hi all!I'm writing my degree thesis. Part of it, deal with UML and expecially of skas and uml patches.I need a detailed decription of both patches, eg. what do they works for, how, etc...Could you write for me a detailed description for both of them?
- Why use patches?- Why do they work?- How do th
