On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:37:04PM -0700, Christopher Marshall wrote:
> A "ps waux" from the host, and from one of the guests, and the
> output of "vmstst 5 5" from the host?
Yes, but more vmstat than that, maybe a few minutes worth.
> I don't know what D state is.
The STAT field in ps.
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:18:46AM -0700,
Christopher Marshall wrote:
> I waited about 10 minutes for my various applications to speed up
> again (they didn't) after attempting to interact with them and killed
> all the uml instances. At that point, all my app
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:18:46AM -0700, Christopher Marshall wrote:
> I waited about 10 minutes for my various applications to speed up
> again (they didn't) after attempting to interact with them and killed
> all the uml instances. At that point, all my applications (basically
> broswer insta
Jeff:
I was running my workstation with no swap enabled.
I waited about 10 minutes for my various applications to speed up again (they
didn't) after attempting to interact with them and killed all the uml
instances. At that point, all my applications (basically broswer instances and
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:29:14AM -0700, Christopher Marshall wrote:
> I left a set of 4 UML instances running overnight and noticed that
> in the morning my computer was not very responsive (every application
> I tried to interact with seemed slow). vmstat reported 96% IO wait
> (wa%).
Offhand
I left a set of 4 UML instances running overnight and noticed that in the
morning my computer was not very responsive (every application I tried to
interact with seemed slow). vmstat reported 96% IO wait (wa%).
Does it make sense that leaving UML instances running would raise this
statistic ov