Hi Paolo
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 21:15 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2005 10:31, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Hi Paolo
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
> > the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
> > rea
On Monday 25 April 2005 10:31, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Hi Paolo
>
> Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
> the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
> read on...
>
> On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 17:12 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sun
Hi Paolo
Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
read on...
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 17:12 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2005 05:20, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
On Sunday 24 April 2005 05:20, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've been banging my head against this one for a while now, so I finally
> figured I could do with some help (and it might even be a bug in
> UML). ;-)
> I am trying to set up a 2.6 UML instance on a VIA C3 Samuel2 [1] based
> s
Hi all
I've been banging my head against this one for a while now, so I finally
figured I could do with some help (and it might even be a bug in
UML). ;-)
I am trying to set up a 2.6 UML instance on a VIA C3 Samuel2 [1] based
system running a freshly installed Debian Sarge. In TT mode, everything
