Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-08 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:06:15PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: >> I suppose that the only processes to consider are those running under my >> uid (as I only started UML using my own user account - and noone else is >> using UML on t

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-08 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:06:15PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > I suppose that the only processes to consider are those running under my > uid (as I only started UML using my own user account - and noone else is > using UML on the machine). There are no such suspect processes. Yet I > can still re

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-08 Thread Jan Ploski
Jeff Dike wrote: >>How can I find out the offender? lsof does not show any processes >>accessing root_fs. > > > Look for a process that you can't explain, on the same terminal, > possibly with an odd name. Jeff, I suppose that the only processes to consider are those running under my uid (as

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-08 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:39:27PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > Thanks, I will try this out. The bad thing is that if it's a host bug on > x86_64 then it will likely affect other clusters (on the German Grid) as > well. The major advantage I saw/see in wrapping jobs into a UML instance > was/is th

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-08 Thread Jan Ploski
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 05/07/2007 11:07:27 PM: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > > This is on x86_64 architecture. > > > 2.6.21-mm1. The file system is the Debian root_fs downloaded from the > > web site. I did an apt-get upgrade and installed a fe

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-07 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > "end_time" (or maybe "start_time"?) was undefined, I just commented out > the line to get it to compile. I just send this fix to Andrew. > This is on x86_64 architecture. > 2.6.21-mm1. The file system is the Debian root_fs downloaded

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-06 Thread Jan Ploski
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:33:22PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > >>I repeated the tests with linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2 (didn't compile right >>away, required a one-liner fix) > > > What fix? kernel/tlb.c:255 contains the statement: log_info("total flush time - %Ld nsecs\n", end_tim

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:33:22PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > I repeated the tests with linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm2 (didn't compile right > away, required a one-liner fix) What fix? > and also linux-2.6.21-mm1 (didn't > compile right away either, as the file required-features.h was missing > in incl

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-05 Thread Jan Ploski
Blaisorblade wrote: >>I'm having trouble applying the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 patch against 2.6.21 >>sources - lots of rejected hunks (but not all) when I run patch -p1 < >>2.6.21-rc7-mm2, and the kernel does not compile after that. I have never >>used mm kernels before and Google did not help identify my m

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:22:30AM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > I'm having trouble applying the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 patch against 2.6.21 > sources It applies against 2.6.20. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:22:30AM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > I'm having trouble applying the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 patch against 2.6.21 > sources As Blaisorblade pointed out more accurately, you start with 2.6.20, apply the 2.6.21-rc7 patch, then the 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 patch. I think you can also grab a f

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-04 Thread Blaisorblade
On sabato 5 maggio 2007, Jan Ploski wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > >>I am experimenting with UML in a HPC cluster. What I do is basically > >> start up 60 instances all at once, a bunch of instances on each hardware > >> node, using the r

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-04 Thread Jan Ploski
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > >>I am experimenting with UML in a HPC cluster. What I do is basically start >>up 60 instances all at once, a bunch of instances on each hardware node, >>using the resource manager TORQUE. Each instance gets a diffe

Re: [uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Jan Ploski wrote: > I am experimenting with UML in a HPC cluster. What I do is basically start > up 60 instances all at once, a bunch of instances on each hardware node, > using the resource manager TORQUE. Each instance gets a different umid. > The inst

[uml-user] Erratic "INIT: Id 0 respawning too fast" behavior

2007-05-04 Thread Jan Ploski
Hello, I am experimenting with UML in a HPC cluster. What I do is basically start up 60 instances all at once, a bunch of instances on each hardware node, using the resource manager TORQUE. Each instance gets a different umid. The instances are configured to boot up, execute a job and halt afte