On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:37:40PM +0200, Celso González wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:02:48AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
> > remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
> > after y
Celso González wrote:
> 1. ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promisc up
..
> 7. brctl addif uml-bridge eth0
These look good, but obviously you haven't added the UML TAP yet.
> The bridge it's up, but I lose all the conectivity in the machine even
> a single ping doesnt respond.
I am assuming here that you m
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:02:48AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
> remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
> after you've reconfigured for bridging?
Yup, the interface dont have a default
Are you on the same network as the machine, or are you remote? If you're
remote, have you ensured that you're machines default route is still active
after you've reconfigured for bridging?
Tony
>>> Celso González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/23/05 07:31AM >>>
Hi people
I will try to explain my situ
Hi people
I will try to explain my situation.
I have a linux machine with a physical interface and 2 public internet
ips.
I have installed a uml machine (2.6.12-rc4 works great) and i want to
assign one of the public ips to the daemons in the uml machine while
the host machine (vanilla 2.6.11.10)
