Hi Paolo,
>Try also following this (from another email) - it appeared in vanilla
>2.6.12
>and may be in your FC4 kernel. Not sure but it may be playing a role
>here:
>
>"It looks like VA space randomization is the culprit. The problem only
>shows up when the host is 2.6.12, and can be solved by
> # Code maturity level options
> #
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
> CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y
> CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y
> CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32
>
> #
> # General setup
> #
> CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
>
> Regards
> Phill.
>
> - Original Message
CLEAN_COMPILE=y
CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y
CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32
#
# General setup
#
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
Regards
Phill.
- Original Message -
From: "Blaisorblade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Phill Wombat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 22,
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 01:48, Phill Wombat wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> This is where I am, and probably reflects the current state of play with
> UML, is this how it should be as you understand things right now?:
No, case 2 and 4 are unexpected failures, the rest is as expected. Fix case 2
and you'll
Hi Paolo,
This is where I am, and probably reflects the current state of play with
UML, is this how it should be as you understand things right now?:
1) 32 bit SMP dual machine. SKAS mode
../linux-2.6.12/linux mem=160M ubda=root
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 00:36, Phill Wombat wrote:
> Oops sent it directly to you. Here it is via the list...
>
> Cheers
> Phill.
>
> Forwarded Message
>
> > From: Phill Wombat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [uml-user] x86_64 UML won'
Oops sent it directly to you. Here it is via the list...
Cheers
Phill.
Forwarded Message
> From: Phill Wombat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] x86_64 UML won't boot on IBM x336
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:27:50 +1000
>
> Hi Pa
