Similarly to this, I have been running uml_switch with directly specified subnets as follows:
uml_switch -unix ./s0
uml_switch -unix ./s1
and so forth, where each of ./s0, ./s1, etc. provide a specific connection.
I can then connect various interfaces to the appropriate sockets at start time
o lie on port = 0 than on INADDR_ANY(you'd at least need to be root to use a port < 1024, and I think port 0 is
invalid).-- Forwarded Message --Subject: Re: [uml-user] Static Multicast Routing on UML...Date: Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:09From: frank evans <
[EMAIL P
Hi UML'ers,
OK, NEVERMIND! It all works fine...I just can't type...
Best Regards,
Ben EvansOn 1/27/06, frank evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi UML'ers,
Well, you have all been helpful with my previous problems, so now I have another question:
1) I want to set up a UML
, but I get the same error message.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ben EvansOn 1/27/06, frank evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, and another UML'er has pointed me to patches he used
successfully to compile with gcc4. I'm going to give them a try...
On 1/27/06, Blaisorblade <[EMAI
Yes, and another UML'er has pointed me to patches he used successfully to compile with gcc4. I'm going to give them a try...
On 1/27/06, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 27 January 2006 19:52, frank evans wrote:> I changed the defconfig in arch/um to inclu
I changed the defconfig in arch/um to include CONFIG_IP_MROUTE and that set it up correctly...
Much thanks to all...
Now I have another question:
I patched linux-2.4.28 with the uml patch 2.4.27-1, did the configs,
make, etc. If I make linux on one host, running Fedora Core 3,
with a gcc3.4.2 e
