Re: [uml-user] Could UML run via seccomp traps instead of ptrace?

> Hello! Hi, >So I've been spending some time in UML (among other virtualization > technologies). There's some interesting security and performance models it > possibly allows, even in this era of containers and hypervisors. Ptrace is > being something of a problem though; it's a little hai

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

Zitat von Richard Weinberger : > Thomas, > > Am 09.05.2017 um 10:15 schrieb Thomas Meyer: >> attached patch work correctly under Linux. But no change under WSL. >> As stated in the relevant GH issue, there seems to be far more road >> blockers to make UML work unde

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

Zitat von Richard Weinberger : > Thomas, > > Can you please give the attached patch a try? Hi, attached patch work correctly under Linux. But no change under WSL. As stated in the relevant GH issue, there seems to be far more road blockers to make UML work under WSL. With you patch I get u

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Thomas Meyer : > > >> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Richard Weinberger : >> >> Thomas, >> >> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Meyer: >>>> We could figure how to report issues to WSL, create self-hosting

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Richard Weinberger : > > Thomas, > > Am 08.05.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Meyer: >>> We could figure how to report issues to WSL, create self-hosting unit tests >>> and ask them to add/fix >>> these features. >>

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Richard Weinberger : > > Thomas, > >> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Meyer: >> Sadly, UML executable bails out very early. it Looks like WSL is missing >> some PTRACE stuff: >> >> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U:/mnt

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] UML on WSL

Zitat von Richard Weinberger : > Thomas, > > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: >> Hi, Hi, >> >> Did anybody try to run UML on the new Windows 10 subsystem for Linux? I >> wonder what missing functions may hinder to run UML on WSL? > &g

[uml-user] UML on WSL

Hi, Did anybody try to run UML on the new Windows 10 subsystem for Linux? I wonder what missing functions may hinder to run UML on WSL? See also https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/commandline/wsl/release_notes With kind regards Thomas---

Re: [uml-user] Mailing list posts subject to approval?

Am 10. September 2016 18:51:02 MESZ, schrieb Massimo Rimondini : >Hi, > >I have posted 2 messages to this list more than one month ago, and >still they do not show up in the mailing list archives. >Considering that the last publicly documented messages date back to >last June, I wonder whether the

Re: [uml-user] Website is in need of many small changes and updates?

Am 31.10.2015 4:39 vorm. schrieb Balaco Baco : > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote: > > >> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhe

[uml-user] Long loop in __getnsdayoftime() after resume from ram

Hello, in UML kernel 3.16.1 I get a long loop in __getnstimeofday() (kernel/time/timekeeping.c:315) in the call of timespec_add_ns(), because it seems like the tk->xtime_sec wasn't updated yet, but the nsecs were. nsecs can be as high as 8111000111000111000l when left the host kernel suspended to

[uml-user] 3.16 build without optimization fails

Hi, the build with -O0 fails with: make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=init gcc -Wp,-MD,init/.main.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.3/include -I./arch/um/include -Iarch/um/include/generated -Iinclude -I./arch/um/include/uapi -Iarch/um/include/generated/uapi -I./in

[uml-user] Fwd: UML: Get's stuck

>> On May 20, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: >> >> I still run into this error, too! >> >> My previous statement that this issue is fixed was wrong. >> >> With kind regards >> Thomas >> >> Am 20.05.2014 16:32 schrieb Jo

Re: [uml-user] UML: Get's stuck

Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > > Am 14.03.2014 15:57, schrieb Thomas Meyer: > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > >> Am 06.11.2013 20:52, schrieb Thomas Meyer: > >>> Am Mittwoch, de

Re: [uml-user] UML: Get's stuck

Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > Am 06.11.2013 20:52, schrieb Thomas Meyer: > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>

Re: [uml-user] UML: Get's stuck

Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 20:59 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > Am 06.11.2013 20:52, schrieb Thomas Meyer: > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>

Re: [uml-user] UML: Get's stuck

Am Mittwoch, den 06.11.2013, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Richard Weinberger: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running Fedora 20 inside a 3.12 UML kernel and the "yum upgrade -y" > > command seems to get stuck after a w

[uml-user] UML: Get's stuck

Hi, I'm running Fedora 20 inside a 3.12 UML kernel and the "yum upgrade -y" command seems to get stuck after a while/few minutes. Any ideas what's going one here? How to debug this? It looks like the process running yum is in state ptrace stopped, but doesn't continue. The process tree looks al