subject about says it all. Is anyone succesfully running UML on a FC3
host successfully? If so, which host & guest kernels are you using?
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LlamaLand
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> D: 21605
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Finally got around to trying this, and i'm having problems. i pulled
> > 2.6.11-rc3 and patched it to -mm3 w/o issue.
>
> -mm1?
doh!
>
> > Now the skas0 patch that
> > is supposedly for 2.6.11-rc3-mm3 has rejects:
>
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> > impliment it?
>
> See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
>
> In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementat
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Xen ( http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/index.html. ) or UML
> for set-up a multi VirtualServer machines ?
> Witch is the best ?
That's like walking into a Ford dealer and ask them whether Ford or GM
make better cars.
--
~~~
On 02/03/2005 06:48 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
impliment it?
See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementation by me
an
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I honestly didn't know that I could use the FC3 kernels for the host.
> > I had built my own vanilla 2.6.10 with the assorted 'bb' patches. Do
> > i need to rebuild the FC3 kernel RPM with UML patches applied, or does
> > the stand
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> > blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
>
> I've had all sorts of problems with FC3 hosts (on x86_64, but it looks like
> i386 is just as broken).
I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it blows up
almost immediately in the boot process with:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>
Kernel panic:
check_ptrace : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
In idle task - not syncing
<6>SysRq : Show Regs
EIP: 0
What happens if you export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 before running your java
widget?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Peter wrote:
> Your report is with a 1.3 JDK. I'd suggest if you want to use Java, use
> a 1.4.2 JDK. They are pretty solid.
>
> The problem I am getting does not result in any processes cras
