Yes, I read it. I've tried to mean it in my last post.
Sorry for slow answer.
And thanks again...
2005/5/16, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 20:27, Marcio Scheibler wrote:
> > Comments below...
> Read the typo message?
>
> > In future
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kaiserslautern/Mehlbach
> pgp-fingerprint: 6118 C35D FE0F 5FDE D632 E8EF ECE7 EA5F 6BDB F776
>
>
--
-
Marcio Scheibler
---
xtensions on device a01ecac0(lo)
> > IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
> > eth0: no IPv6 routers present
>
> > Listing permissions:
>
> Ok, they seem good.
>
> --
> Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
> Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
> Linux registere
Sorry,
Forget to reply also to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcio Scheibler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16/05/2005 09:49
Subject: Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??
To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I use host logical volumes
arsed. For a nineth argument,
it correctly points error (n > MAXDEV).
I'm unable to go ahead with this tracing for while, but I guess it's sufficient
to show arguments being worked. So I believe there's other reason...
2005/5/12, Edward Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 5
successfully that seventh UBD device
(/dev/ubdg) and after that, mount its filesystem.
Is it a undocummented restriction ?
Host kernel: 2.6.10-skas3v7
UML kernel: 2.6.10
Thanks in advance.
--
-----
Marcio Scheibler
--
