Jim Carter schreef:
With many guests on one host, remember that the CPU is shared, and if
several guests get CPU-intensive at the same time their individual
performance will drop off. Also UMLs take a lot of memory; be sure there's
enough.
Do UMLs really take a lot of extra memory? I'm using a
Blaisorblade schreef:
That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and run
uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See the main
page for more info (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ -> Virtual
networking).
Thanks for the tip. Seems to be wo
Blaisorblade schreef:
Ah, ok, I see - you're using a 2.4 host kernel. TLS support can't work
correctly then - all I can do is provide a better diagnostic for this case.
You should continue using the "move /lib/tls away" solution, but on some
distro (like Fedora Core 4 and beyond) it won't work
Blaisorblade schreef:
Thanks a lot for the fix. It indeed solves the problem. I had actually
also tried 2.6.15-bs3, but that gave me lot's of new TLS errors (and
things still weren't working), so it seemed even worse.
It was -bs3 or -bs1? -bs1 gave a lot of messages, but -bs3 not, and until now
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
tap device.
My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
you get one big virtual ethernet network.
I now get 'TUNSETIFF failed, errno = 16' when I try to get the second
UML to work though.
Blaisorblade schreef:
On Friday 10 March 2006 01:06, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
try
rm -rf /lib/tls
At most mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.away - 2.6.15-bs3 supports TLS, and 2.6.17 should
include officially the support.
Thanks a lot for the fix. It indeed solves the problem. I had actually
also tr
Hi,
I seem to have a problem were certain kinds of applications segfault
when trying to run or use them.
I'm using Debian Sarge. The guest kernel I'm using is version
2.6.15.6-bs2. I also had the problem with a plain 2.6.15.1 kernel.
My host is Slackware 10.1 with kernel version 2.4.26.
The
I've finally found some time to look into this again.
Blaisorblade wrote:
I haven't got any X11 stuff at all on my server, so I can't really try
that. I just did xhost +serverhostname on my workstation, this should allow
all connections from that host?
Apart that as you say con=pts is good, b
Hi,
Thanks again for your messages!
Blaisorblade wrote:
I do not have X11 on my server. I also tried it with the DISPLAY
environent pointing to my workstation's X11 server, but I got another
error then.
Test if you can open an xterm directly first, it's not so easy (at least you
need to use x
Thanks a lot for your messages!
I still seem to have some issues though.
Blaisorblade wrote:
Still using devfs? I've seen some systems hanging because of that, time ago...
I don't know. I believe the guide said the default kernel configuration
would produce a working system, so I'm using that.
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a Debian UML system, but I can't seem to get the
Debian root images to work. One of them just hangs during the
initialization (after I had created a symlink manually from /dev/ubd0 to
/dev/ubd/0) and another one tried to launch an xterm (?) after
initialization.
Is it
11 matches
Mail list logo
