Am 10.09.2012 21:02, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
> yes
> :-)
Good.
>
>
> BTW and now to a complete different thing :
> Why is the kernel option CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL not selectable for
> UM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2012 08:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Does the attached patch fix the issue for you?
>
yes
:-)
BTW and now to a complete different thing :
Why is the kernel option CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL not selectable for
UML ?
- --
MfG/Since
Am 10.09.2012 19:37, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/10/2012 04:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
>>> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>>>
semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2012 04:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
>> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>>
>>> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 327
Am 10.09.2012 15:56, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>
>> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 32769 semctl(32769, 0,
>> IPC_64|SETVAL, 0xbfa05178) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>> semctl(32769, 0, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2012 06:55 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Kind of. semctl() fails for whatever reason.
>
> semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT|0600) = 32769 semctl(32769, 0,
> IPC_64|SETVAL, 0xbfa05178) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> semctl(32769, 0, IPC_6
