Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:51 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > > f2c0d0266cc5eb36a4aa44944b4096ec1214

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
Ooops, sorry, forget the full CC: On Fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:51 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > > f

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 14.10.2011 12:08, schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: > The question is IMHO more in the direction of: > Shouldn't `make mrproper` delete *all* generated files from all > architectures (and not only the current one) to get the tree in a (or > actually the) pristine state? To achieve this the Makefile ne

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > f2c0d0266cc5eb36a4aa44944b4096ec121490aa of linus'es git tree. However, > everything is running now. It w