Re: [uml-user] ssh problem

2008-08-06 Thread Shehla Saleem
I was able to solve it... apparently some changes had to be made in /etc/inittab. Thanks On 8/6/08, Shehla Saleem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have uml running on my host which has linux 2.6.23.13 on a ubuntu machine. > > My host has both eth0 and tap0 configured with the same addres

[uml-user] ssh problem

2008-08-06 Thread Shehla Saleem
Hi, I have uml running on my host which has linux 2.6.23.13 on a ubuntu machine. My host has both eth0 and tap0 configured with the same address of 130.126.something. I run uml and do ifconfig for eth0 (in uml) to another 130.126.something IP that I have. I add the tap0 address of the host as the

Re: [uml-user] UML check_ptrace ptrace_oldsetoptions failed

2008-08-06 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Giovanni Funchal wrote: > Hi again, > > So, I downloaded and compiled linux 2.6.26 with ARCH=um, but when I > try to run it it says "Checking that ptrace can change system call > numbers...check_ptrace: PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS failed: Input/output > error". > > -- Giovanni You said that you have 2.

[uml-user] UML check_ptrace ptrace_oldsetoptions failed

2008-08-06 Thread Giovanni Funchal
Hi again, So, I downloaded and compiled linux 2.6.26 with ARCH=um, but when I try to run it it says "Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...check_ptrace: PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS failed: Input/output error". -- Giovanni On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Giovanni Funchal <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [uml-user] UML vs installing things in home directory

2008-08-06 Thread Giovanni Funchal
> If you can get your administrator to install such a new kernel, then you > could get UML running and do as you want. Kernel is 2.4.21-47.ELsmp x86_64 and unfortunately, I cant get my administrator to install or update things. Thanks, -- Giovanni On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Benedict Verh

Re: [uml-user] UML vs installing things in home directory

2008-08-06 Thread Benedict Verheyen
Giovanni Funchal wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stuck with an old red hat pc at work (on which I don't have root > access). Now I'm wanting to install a certain program, but after > checking it would require updating lots of dependences including libc, > binutils, gcc, etc. I could go for the old "./configu