Le Mardi, 29 Avril 2008 11:21:29 -0400,
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> You can make the smallest possible kernel that you can boot, but
> it doesn't seem to me that much else will make a big difference in the
> porting effort.
I noticed this thread. By the subject it seems it's taken
2008/5/1 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> > Any news?
>
> The current state of things as I understand them is that we have the
> eject ioctl being called in exactly the same way from eject and from
> UML and it behaves differently. This, of
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> Any news?
The current state of things as I understand them is that we have the
eject ioctl being called in exactly the same way from eject and from
UML and it behaves differently. This, of course, shouldn't happen, so
there must be somethi
