Hi All,
I wrote a module that puts a netfitler hook on receiving IP packets
(NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING).
I want to debug it using UML, but strangely, the skbuf I get in the hook is
always NULL.
This looks strange to me as the module has worked in real linux pretty well.
I use linux version 2.6.24.1 f
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:55:44PM -0400, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> I don't seem to have a "slabinfo" in my /proc directory. According to
> some google searching, this is due to a bug in ubuntu gutsy. Should I
> upgrade to hardy to fix this so I can give you the data you want, or
> would that potentia
I don't seem to have a "slabinfo" in my /proc directory. According to
some google searching, this is due to a bug in ubuntu gutsy. Should I
upgrade to hardy to fix this so I can give you the data you want, or
would that potentially break our ability to nail down this bug?
Jonas
On Mon, 2008-04-
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 01:09:48PM -0400, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a UML issue, but my machine is acting very
> strange, so I'm wondering if it is.
>
> I have a guest that has 512Mb of memory assigned to it. After running
> mysql, apache, and mongrel (ruby on rails application
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:21:41PM +0100, robl wrote:
>> I've recently upgraded my UML setup from a 2.6.8+skas3 host kernel to a
>> 2.6.18+skas on debian etch. I've also upgraded to using the nagafix
>> kernel32-2.6.24.3 kernel to run my guest instances in.
>>
>> I uses to be a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 03:05:13PM +0200, Joel Palmius wrote:
> I've been trying to get humfs to work, but I can't find it in 2.6.25.
I never sent it to mainline because of bugs I never fixed.
> Is humfs a patch you need to download or something?
Yup - see http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net
I'm not sure if this is a UML issue, but my machine is acting very
strange, so I'm wondering if it is.
I have a guest that has 512Mb of memory assigned to it. After running
mysql, apache, and mongrel (ruby on rails application server) for
several days, the machine has killed off mysql and mongrel
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:02:26PM +0200, Daniel Janzon wrote:
> Are there any reasons UML will not be able to run on for instance ARM
> platforms?
Nope.
> I see in arch/um that there is some processor-dependent code
> for x86 and ppc. Is this code strictly needed in order to run UML? Or is
> on
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:44:13AM -0400, lanas wrote:
> That system tries to load ipSec and in turn ipSec complains that
> the /lib/modules/2.6.24.2 directory can't be found.
>
> Of course it won't be found because that system was initially built
> using 2.6.18-6-gx1. I copied it into a flat
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:21:41PM +0100, robl wrote:
> I've recently upgraded my UML setup from a 2.6.8+skas3 host kernel to a
> 2.6.18+skas on debian etch. I've also upgraded to using the nagafix
> kernel32-2.6.24.3 kernel to run my guest instances in.
>
> I uses to be able to specify mem=3072
Hi,
I've recently upgraded my UML setup from a 2.6.8+skas3 host kernel to a
2.6.18+skas on debian etch. I've also upgraded to using the nagafix
kernel32-2.6.24.3 kernel to run my guest instances in.
I uses to be able to specify mem=3072M to the guest instance, but when I
try this now I see :
11 matches
Mail list logo
