On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:47:22PM +0100, Flavio wrote:
> I saw many patches attached to these eleven e-mails.
> Shall I apply all of them, one by one, or is there a unique patch
> including all changes?
0/10 has a full rolled-up patch at the bottom.
Jeff
--
Work
Thanks a lot,
Best regards,
Flavio
On 23/01/2008, Ryan Finnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 12:47 PM, Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I saw many patches attached to these eleven e-mails.
> > Shall I apply all of them, one by one, or is there a unique patch
> > including all
On Jan 23, 2008 12:47 PM, Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I saw many patches attached to these eleven e-mails.
> Shall I apply all of them, one by one, or is there a unique patch
> including all changes?
The first one he sent (0/10) had the full patch. You can either apply
that patch, or appl
Thank you very much for the SKAS4 release,
I appreciate your work a lot. I think I'll try it very soon
(especially on my amd64).
I only have one question because I'm little bit confused.
I saw many patches attached to these eleven e-mails.
Shall I apply all of them, one by one, or is there a uni
diff --git a/arch/um/include/as-layout.h b/arch/um/include/as-layout.h
index a5cdf95..90ee798 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/as-layout.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/as-layout.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#define ASM_STUB_CODE (UML_CONFIG_TOP_ADDR - 2 * UM_KERN_PAGE_SIZE)
#define ASM_STUB_DATA (UML_CONFIG_TOP_ADDR
UML already had a new_mm(). This is renamed to make_new_mm().
diff --git a/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h b/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h
index d6cbb4f..061a362 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ extern int skas_needs_stub;
extern int user_thr
Tidy the existing stub code so that the skas4 code can be dropped in.
diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/mem.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/mem.c
index 484e68f..efda5e1 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/mem.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/mem.c
@@ -40,35 +40,69 @@ static unsigned long syscall_regs[MAX_R
Tidy arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c in preparation for host SKAS4 testing.
There are now explicit variables for disabling any particular host
capability.
init_registers is moved out of the skas3 testing because it needs to
happen every time, and the skas3 checks will become optional.
diff -
The nastiness in arch/um/include/siginfo_segv.h is defining the new
siginfo_t structure in place of the old one, which requires using CPP
to rename the old one out of the way.
diff --git a/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h b/arch/um/include/skas/skas.h
index b073f8a..d6cbb4f 100644
--- a/arch/um/include
copy_siginfo_to_user correctly strips off the high bits of si->si_code
before copying it to userspace.
Unfortunately, ptrace32_siginfo calls copy_siginfo_to_user to put the
siginfo into a temporary userspace buffer and counts on the high bits
still being present so that it may initialize the u
This is the new_mm, switch_mm, and /proc//mm implementation for
32- and 64-bit x86 and UML, plus 32-bit support on 64-bit x86.
diff --git a/arch/um/include/skas_ptrace.h b/arch/um/include/skas_ptrace.h
index cd2327d..6b55c52 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/skas_ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/skas_ptr
Add CPU trap number and error code to siginfo_t in the SIGSEGV case for x86.
diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
index 6ea19c2..2f74adf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c
@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_
Extract the system call execution loop in the stubs into a macro
A later patch will need this loop, so this makes it available.
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/stub.S b/arch/um/sys-i386/stub.S
index e730772..890dc50 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-i386/stub.S
+++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/stub.S
@@ -1,52 +1,
Fix a bug which will be important later. x86_64 copy_thread needs to
copy %fs from parent to child.
diff --git a/include/asm-um/processor-x86_64.h
b/include/asm-um/processor-x86_64.h
index d946bf2..0528d9e 100644
--- a/include/asm-um/processor-x86_64.h
+++ b/include/asm-um/processor-x86_64.h
@@
Did that, but saw no differences in ioctl's, which led me to the conclusion
that I hadn't done
my setserials correctly... So I slapped myself in the face, did setserial on
the host and in the UML,
and now it works.
Apparently setserial was not needed on ports /dev/ttyS0 and /dev/ttyS1, but
indeed
15 matches
Mail list logo