On Wednesday 17 October 2007 11:34 pm Peter Chant wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 October 2007, David Houlden wrote:
> > Using udev, the tap0 interface doesn't come up on the host and in the
> > guest I get device not found from "ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.51 up". What I
> > have found is that in /proc/net/d
It's ok. Problem solved. The mac addresses were being remembered in udev rules
by Slackware and because I got a different address each time, the eth device
number was being incremented. With a fixed mac address on the eth0= startup
parameter and a reset of the udev rules it now works.
Dave.
On
On Wednesday 17 October 2007, David Houlden wrote:
> Using udev, the tap0 interface doesn't come up on the host and in the guest
> I get device not found from "ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.51 up". What I have
> found is that in /proc/net/dev on the guest I have a device eth17. Next
> time I boot the gu
Hi,
I'm running a 2.6.22.10 host with 2.6.23 guest. Both are Slackware. I'm trying
to use udev in the guest and it works apart from the fact I can't get
networking to work in the guest. I'm using tun/tap with the uml_net helper
but I get the same problem if I do the set up of the tap0 device my
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply
> Perceptive :-)
That's one of my better qualities.
> Are these numbers from immediately after boot?
The bug also seems to have a mind of its' own. Every few reboots, the
bug is non-existent. Yes, those numbers are after a reboot.
Jay
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:58:29PM +0100, Jay Shah wrote:
> I have recently compiled the 2.6.23 kernel, and I have noticed that
> the uptime registers:
>
> 12:56:49 up -24855 days, -3:-14,
Hmmm. It's OK here.
> I have a hunch that the above is not normal,
Perceptive :-)
> and although I did
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:16:32AM +0200, Stefan Kraxberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently trying to get UML running inside XEN. But apparently the
> execution stops
> after VFS: mounted root (ext3 filesystem) read only.
>
> If I try to run UML with the same configuration inside dom0 it works f
