Re: [uml-user] Loopback mounts broken in 2.6.23-rc3?

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:27:28PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > That's interesting: > > > root@(none):/sys# exit > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > UML now segfaults on a panic? Yup, it aborts so I get a core dump as well as a stack tr

Re: [uml-user] Loopback mounts broken in 2.6.23-rc3?

2007-08-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 23 August 2007 9:56:33 pm Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:47:33PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > Does anybody know why loopback mounts stopped working when I went > > from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23-rc3? My config didn't change, the only thing > > that did was which source tarball

[uml-user] [PATCH] convert #include "linux/..." and #include "asm/..." to #include <...>

2007-08-24 Thread Joe Perches
There are several files that: #include "linux/file" not #include #include "asm/file" not #include Here's the little script that converted them: egrep -i -r -l --include=*.[ch] \ "^[[:space:]]*\#[[:space:]]*include[[:space:]]*\"(linux|asm)/(.*)\"" * \ | xargs sed -i -e 's/^[[:space:]]*#[[:spac

Re: [uml-user] dualboot laptop becomes hot after running uml kernels

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:33:43AM -0400, Matthew T. Engel wrote: > I'm thinking that it is safe to assume that the problem lies somewhere > within the linux kernels. Is there a good way to monitor/track the kernel's > effect on the hardware so that I may be able to tell for certain if it is > the

Re: [uml-user] sharing filesystem between UML's (ocfs2?)

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > Hmmm it's indeed running as root then. The reason is this: > all uml's get started automatically at the start of the system because they > are meant to act as virtualized servers. > What is a good solution if i want the UML's to

Re: [uml-user] slow ftp

2007-08-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Mark wrote: > Sorry about the HTML email, I think it is disabled now. Yup, thanks. > The ioctl calls that returned -1 from the strace are: > ioctl (4, TIOCGSERIAL) > ioctl (3, TIOCMGET,[0]) > ioctl (4, SNDCTL_TMR_START or TCSETS, {B230400 -opost -isig -ic