On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:13:45PM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> OK, I just built a 2.6.20.4 UML kernel, and at first sight it seems to
> run fine with size=2048M. (With higher values, it still seems fine with
> size=2800M, and completely fails to boot with size=2900M or higher.)
It's occupying
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>
>>Linux version 2.6.18 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061028
>
>
> Can you try something a bit more modern? I don't know that I
> specifically fixed anything related to large memories, but something
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Linux version 2.6.18 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061028
Can you try something a bit more modern? I don't know that I
specifically fixed anything related to large memories, but something
seems to have improved since 2.
Jeff Dike wrote:
>>It seems that UML does not run properly when given too much memory.
>>After a few tries, there seem to be a limit somewhere below 1.5GB
>>memory. The actual limit appears to be moving with some parameters
>>(disks, root, initrd, ...).
>>With my few tests:
>> size=1408M seems to
