Hi,
I've been running some x86_64 guests with the new ptrace_fixes patch
for the last few days. For the most part everything has been running
very well, but I have encountered a couple of problems running the
apache2 server. The first problem is documented here.
Ordinarily apache2 runs just fine
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:26:17PM +, Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> By the way... I've been trying to setup a UML based startup and I
> wanted to share one of the things that are really important to me
> about UML.
>
> Because it's a process I can use normal accounting to charge out
> UMLs. I can
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, the rest of that will be true (with some crossed fingers on
> the performance part since I have no numbers yet).
How much slower is UML than Xen anyway?
I've always found it pretty good.
By the way... I've been trying to setup a UML based startu
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:13:28PM -0600, Alex Strasheim wrote:
> Are there any links available to information about how KVM and UML are
> going to be integrated? I've just heard that this is going to happen
> down the road, and I'm trying to get a handle on it.
I gave a talk on this at LCA, an
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:09:47PM -0500, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> then when I screen in to the guest and attempt to login, I have a
> problem. I type my user name at the prompt and hit return, and I get an
> immediate "Login timed out after 60 seconds". It is impossible to type
> the password before
Are there any links available to information about how KVM and UML are
going to be integrated? I've just heard that this is going to happen
down the road, and I'm trying to get a handle on it.
Would that take us to a world in which UML performs about as well as
xen, a linux kernel on the host
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 06:53:31PM +, jez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:10:53PM -0500, Jonas Meyer wrote:
>
> I'd write a decent script to throw into /etc/network/if-up.d to
> give you some eyes and ears on what's taking place and how long
> it's taking. A good start would even be to just
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:10:53PM -0500, Jonas Meyer wrote:
> I just tested it, and exactly the same thing happens. Does anybody have
> any ideas? This is kind of annoying.
>
I'd write a decent script to throw into /etc/network/if-up.d to
give you some eyes and ears on what's taking place and
I just tested it, and exactly the same thing happens. Does anybody have
any ideas? This is kind of annoying.
Jonas
jez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 05:09:47PM -0500, Jonas Meyer wrote:
>> auto eth0
>> iface eth0 inet static
>> address 192.168.1.4
>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:39:32AM +, Jason Lunz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > After reboot I had to reset the permissions on /dev/net/tun to 660 but
> > then it all worked fine. how can I get the permissions 660 to stick
> > on /dev/net/tun?
>
> If the permissions change with reboo
I've been out of UML for a while, but perhaps I can still throw something
useful in the mix.
rh
#!/bin/bash
#
# tuntap script
#
# Create and configure the tap devices for UML users
# This script will do a maximum of 10 (0-9), but can easily be changed
#
# You can delete (or rename) the "uml_net
11 matches
Mail list logo
