W A T C H O U T!
Here comes the big one!
All signs show that AETR is going to Explode!
ALLIANCE ENTERPRISE (AETR)
Current Price 0.50
Add this gem to your watch list, and watch it trad closely!
NEWS RELEASE
TAECORP ANNOUNCES BREAKTHROUGH IN REMOVING DEADLY LANDMINES.
TaeCorp Announces That NA
>> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs':
>> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: 'JB_PC' undeclared
>> (first use in this function)
>
> Jeff Dike posted this link
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/patches/jmpbuf
> to a
Sven Köhler wrote:
> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs':
> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: 'JB_PC' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
Jeff Dike posted this link
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17-rc4/patches/jmp
> Hmm, so i some problems over here on x86:
>
> uml-host linux-2.6.17.13 # LANG=C make ARCH=um vmlinux
> SYMLINK arch/um/include/kern_constants.h
> SYMLINK arch/um/include/sysdep
> make[1]: `arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.s' is up to date.
> CHK arch/um/include/user_constants.h
> CHK
>> has anybody of you gentoo-users out there (maybe Blaisorblade?) tried
>> UML with glibc 2.4 (which seems to be nptlonly!)?
> As things stands, this should be especially tested on amd64 host - Antoine
> Martin reported it works on x86 ones.
Hmm, so i some problems over here on x86:
uml-host li
On Monday 04 September 2006 20:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Nic James Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > In the host side of tap device the mac address seems to be random
> > > but it seems like in guest side the mac address is derived from
> > > first given
On Monday 04 September 2006 21:23, Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I beg to differ. Here is some mac-addresses which I have on my
> > running umls and their respective ip:
> >
> > fe:fd:ac:10:2a:0d 172.16.42.13
> > fe:fd:c0:a8:02:04 192.168.2.4
> > fe:fd:ac:10:2a:
Hello!
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the host side of tap device the mac address seems to be random but it
> > seems like in guest side the mac address is derived from first given
> > ip-address and when using dhcp it's always 0.0.0.0 which causes it to be
> > fe:fd:00:00:00:00.
>
On Monday 04 September 2006 19:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Nic James Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > I call it with "eth2=tuntap,ext-test". I got the impression that it
> > > is enough to do that when I'm using preconfigured interface. At
> > > least ther
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:11, Brock, Anthony - NET wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eugene Morozov
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 9:55 AM
> > Subject: [uml-user] Limit CPU usage
> >
> > Is it possible to limit CPU usage of an UML instance and processes
> > running inside i
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:08, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody of you gentoo-users out there (maybe Blaisorblade?) tried
> UML with glibc 2.4 (which seems to be nptlonly!)?
As things stands, this should be especially tested on amd64 host - Antoine
Martin reported it works on x86 one
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 02:47, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I've upgraded a Gentoo amd64 box to the latest gcc (4.1.1) and glibc
> (2.4-r3). glibc 2.4 is "nptlonly" (at least on gentoo?)
I'd be curious about which is the host kernel and its configuration - there
are a couple of compatibility optio
12 matches
Mail list logo
