How is everything with you and the kids. Hope all is well. Just wanted to
drop a line and see if you heard about the trend in getting in shape. Its
what all the sports players are using.
It is at http://www.shla.dealsandattention.org/by/
it its good enough for Bonds and the other great players, i
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:15:39PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:35:20AM -0700, Jim Carter wrote:
> > untrustedProg cannot use legitimate means to induce UML1's kernel to map
> > kernel memory (except according to the UNIX file permissions of /dev/kmem).
>
> And whether /de
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:35:20AM -0700, Jim Carter wrote:
> untrustedProg cannot use legitimate means to induce UML1's kernel to map
> kernel memory (except according to the UNIX file permissions of /dev/kmem).
And whether /dev/kmem allows writing. This has been controversial in
the past (and
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, TongKe Xue wrote:
> Original Belief: I can use UML as a virtual machine; jail untrusted
> processes.
>
> Let's say I am a user U, on a machine M running Linux.
> I run an instance, UML1 of User Mode Linux.
> Within this instance of UML1, I create a new user "jailedUser".
> "j
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 07:27:00AM -0700, Stephens, Allan wrote:
> When I used "ethX=mcast", each interface I configured on a UML guest
> forwarded all packets sent to the associated multicast group to my
> network protocol software, even though the interfaces were not
> configured as "promiscuous"
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:23:35PM +0200, Christoph Rudorff wrote:
> Thanks, that fixed the problem!
>
> I rebooted it 10 times, it is working now. Is mode=tt broken? I also tried
> that before but:
Yeah, it'll be removed when SMP support for skas is done.
Jeff
"Stephens, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo:
>
> OK, let me take one more try at explaining what I've observed.
> (And my
> apologies for making this whole issue more confusing than necessary
> ...
> I'm pretty inexperienced when it comes to detailing with the
> details of
> ne
Hi Paolo:
OK, let me take one more try at explaining what I've observed. (And my
apologies for making this whole issue more confusing than necessary ...
I'm pretty inexperienced when it comes to detailing with the details of
network interface operation.)
When I used "ethX=daemon", each interface
Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 15:44 schrieb Christoph Rudorff:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:17 schrieb Jeff Dike:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Christoph Rudorff wrote:
> > > TLS probs? No. I removed /lib/tls I double checked if /dev is complete.
> > > If I kill the uml and simply
Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:17 schrieb Jeff Dike:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Christoph Rudorff wrote:
> > TLS probs? No. I removed /lib/tls I double checked if /dev is complete.
> > If I kill the uml and simply retry 2 or 3 times, it boots fine. But they
> > usually do not survi
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Christoph Rudorff wrote:
> I'm using sucessfully several uml's for 2 years now.
>
> I recently upgraded kernels from linux.2.6.11.10-bs5 to linux-2.6.17.7 and
> 2.6.17.7-hmd1.smp.p4_skas3_v9_pre9 for the host machine (hmd = homemade).
>
> I have randomly
Hello ppl!
I'm using sucessfully several uml's for 2 years now.
I recently upgraded kernels from linux.2.6.11.10-bs5 to linux-2.6.17.7 and
2.6.17.7-hmd1.smp.p4_skas3_v9_pre9 for the host machine (hmd = homemade).
I have randomly the problem, that the uml machines hangs on boot at
"VFS: Mounted
12 matches
Mail list logo
