On 7/13/06, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Instead of the patch mentioned earlier, you might also try the one
> below - it depends on klibc, so you need to apply it to a recent -mm
> UML. I'm thinking about sending this to Andrew, despite it's
> nastinesses.
>
> It applies on top of (and
On 7/26/06, Samuel Korpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/06, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of the patch mentioned earlier, you might also try the one
> > below - it depends on klibc, so you need to apply it to a recent -mm
> > UML. I'm thinking about sending this to And
