Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-28 Thread Nix
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Jeff Dike mused: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:36:19AM +0100, Nix wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, paul john uttered the following: >> > if start um without mem=256M , it's ok , if start um with mem=256M it hangs >> > there .report "mount devfs on /dev" >> >> Do you have at least

Re: [uml-user] about mconsole

2006-06-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 03:41, paul john wrote: > when use uml_mconsole umid,192.168.0.254 > show ok . run restart . return connection refused. You run restart and it says "connection refused"? That's because the UML restarted, I guess. Are you assigning an umid to UML? PS: please specify the

Re: [uml-user] starting uml from initscripts?

2006-06-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 00:36, Simon Matthews wrote: > Can anyone suggest a good way to start a UML instance from the host's > initscripts? The host is a RedHat EL3 machine. > > It seems that the UML won't start if it can't attach to a terminal This only happens if you leave the default con0=fd:

Re: [uml-user] starting uml from initscripts?

2006-06-28 Thread Nic James Ferrier
"Simon Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can anyone suggest a good way to start a UML instance from the host's > initscripts? The host is a RedHat EL3 machine. > > It seems that the UML won't start if it can't attach to a terminal, so > unless I can stop this behaviour I don't immediately s

Re: [uml-user] about mem=nM

2006-06-28 Thread paul john
still not work ,  can with 128 ,can't with 256 2006/6/28, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:29:21AM +0800, paul john wrote:> strange that . tried again from mem=64M it's ok . and tried 512M again,works > .  tried again . ok.>> and now it's ok .>> thanks , but i wonder why st