UML exits? Or just strace? Seems like either a strace or ptrace bug.
Sorry - it was strace that exits - the UML is still running.
How about waiting until UML hangs and then attaching strace to it?
So, there are 5 threads of UML. The main (or the first thread) shows:
=
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:40:44PM +, S A wrote:
> Is there a way to make strace work with threads? When i run
> uml under strace, it always exits (and it exits doing something
> innocuos like a fcntl or socketpair).
UML exits? Or just strace? Seems like either a strace or ptrace bug.
How
On Friday 07 April 2006 18:29, Wesley Emeneker wrote:
> Actually, the patch doesn't apply for me.
> Running a "patch -p1 < uml-fix-back-types-no-warning" from the
> linux-2.6.16 directory gives me this error:
> I thought this was weird, so I did my own patch:
Indeed it is - this is likely due to
Hi
Is there a way to make strace work with threads? When i run
uml under strace, it always exits (and it exits doing something
innocuos like a fcntl or socketpair). I also tried this under gdb
and when I interrupt the UML, the backtrace just shows a signal
handler (included below). Another data
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:25:46PM +, S A wrote:
> 1. With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER enabled in .config, bootup stops after
> "VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly" and stderr
> shows the message unable to open console.
Can you strace the thing and see where it's looping?
Hi
I am having a problem getting an initial login prompt on my UML
and it's related to CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER (my host system
is a x86_64 machine running 2.6.16).
With a 2.6.16 codebase (and it has the x86_64 patch referenced
in http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.1/0185.html),
I ob
Actually, the patch doesn't apply for me.
Running a "patch -p1 < uml-fix-back-types-no-warning" from the
linux-2.6.16 directory gives me this error:
Hunk #1 FAILED at 46.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file arch/um/drivers/cow.h.rej
patching file arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h
Hunk #1 s
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:31:06PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> Yes, I tried kernel 2.6.16.1 and that helped, thanks...
>
> frankly a bit tired of porting my modifications to newer kernels... )
> well, at least I keep feeling myself in the thick of things..
2.6.13 was quite a while ago, and UML
>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:30:19PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > UML kernel version 2.6.13-4 with built-in UML running in SKAS3
> > mode. I don't know whether UML code itself has any versioning... host
> > kernel is 2.6.13-15, if it matters.. )
>
> Can you try something newer, to see if
