Re: [uml-user] Re: AMD64 segfaults

2006-04-04 Thread John Parsons
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I boot the UML I notice it says I'm running in SKAS0 mode: > What's the command line you used? linux64 mem=256M eth0=daemon,,unix,/tmp/uml_switch.ctl ubd0=umlpcloc1_cow con0=fd:0,fd:1 device=xterm > > Checking for the skas3 patch in the hos

Re: [uml-user] build problem >= 2.6.16 UPT_SET __jmpbuf undeclared

2006-04-04 Thread D. Bahi
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:48:20PM -0400, D. Bahi wrote: > >> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs': >> <...snip...> >> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:139: error: 'JB_BP' undeclared >> (first use in this function) >> make[4]: *** [arch/um

Re: [uml-user] AMD64 segfaults

2006-04-04 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jeff Dike wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0100, John Parsons wrote: Does skas3 work with AMD64? On x86_64, add noprocmm to the command line if it tries to run in skas3 mode. In your case, it's not seeing any skas3, so that's not an issue. As to why it's not s

Re: [uml-user] 2.6.17-rc1, NPTL/TLS and CFLAGS

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:58:55AM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote: > just wanted to ask: > the TLS patches are already in 2.6.17-rc1, right? Yes. > If so, is there anything recommed concerning the CFLAGS? > The Gentoo Xen HOWTO told me, that i should add > "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs" to avoid some slowd

[uml-user] 2.6.17-rc1, NPTL/TLS and CFLAGS

2006-04-04 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, just wanted to ask: the TLS patches are already in 2.6.17-rc1, right? If so, is there anything recommed concerning the CFLAGS? The Gentoo Xen HOWTO told me, that i should add "-mno-tls-direct-seg-refs" to avoid some slowdown. See http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Xen_and_Gentoo Is "-mno-tls-dire

Re: [uml-user] build problem >= 2.6.16 UPT_SET __jmpbuf undeclared

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:48:20PM -0400, D. Bahi wrote: > arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs': > arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: 'JB_PC' undeclared > (first use in this function) > arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:137: error: (Each undeclared

[uml-user] Re: AMD64 segfaults

2006-04-04 Thread Antoine Martin
> When I boot the UML I notice it says I'm running in SKAS0 mode: What's the command line you used? > Checking for the skas3 patch in the host: > - /proc/mm...not found > - PTRACE_FAULTINFO...not found > - PTRACE_LDT...not found > UML running in SKAS0 mode It doesn't look like you're running

Re: [uml-user] AMD64 segfaults

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0100, John Parsons wrote: > Does skas3 work with AMD64? On x86_64, add noprocmm to the command line if it tries to run in skas3 mode. In your case, it's not seeing any skas3, so that's not an issue. As to why it's not seeing skas3, I don't know. /proc/mm sh

[uml-user] Re: build problem >= 2.6.16 UPT_SET __jmpbuf undeclared

2006-04-04 Thread D. Bahi
sorry. ignore the kernel/uml version information - it's a glibc thing - `rpm -qv glibc` says glibc-2.4-4 how are people building this on fedora core 5 boxen? :-) D. Bahi wrote: > hi all > > building 2.6.17-rc1 with ARCH=um config attached > > on host `uname -a` > > Linux gumby 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5

[uml-user] build problem >= 2.6.16 UPT_SET __jmpbuf undeclared

2006-04-04 Thread D. Bahi
hi all building 2.6.17-rc1 with ARCH=um config attached on host `uname -a` Linux gumby 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 28 03:38:34 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux with `gcc --version` gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 20060304 (Red Hat 4.1.0-3) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free softw

[uml-user] AMD64 segfaults

2006-04-04 Thread John Parsons
Hi, I'm hoping someone can help guide me to a fully working UML setup. On the host, I'm running the AMD64 port of Debian Sarge with a custom kernel built from the standard kernel.org 2.6.16.1 source with the SKAS3-v8.2 patch applied. uname -a gives: Linux bedlam 2.6.16.1-jp5-skas3-v8.2 #1 SMP PRE

[uml-user] Re: FC5 anybody?

2006-04-04 Thread Antoine Martin
> It's here. anyone have it running under UML? Yes, since 2.6.16-bb1 it works reliably, images here: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/FedoraCore5/ Antoine --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends

Re: [uml-user] UML + iSCSI

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:42:27AM +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Is it supposed not to work or is the option simply lacking > in the configuration? > > If it is supposed to work, would it be possible to add the otion to the > configuration for 2.6.17 (or 2.6.18 if it's too late)? I think iSCSI i

Re: [uml-user] FC5 anybody?

2006-04-04 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:59:55PM +, Phill Wombat wrote: > It's here. anyone have it running under UML? I've been running it, since FC4-test, I think. And with 2.6.17-rc1, you can boot it on a stock kernel. Jeff ---

[uml-user] FC5 anybody?

2006-04-04 Thread Phill Wombat
It's here. anyone have it running under UML? Cheers Phill. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime deve

[uml-user] UML + iSCSI

2006-04-04 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, I'm willing to play with iSCSI, but lacking physical machines, I thought I could play with iSCSI with UML hosts. Unfortunately, while iSCSI is supported with 2.6.15.4 i386 kernels, it is not supported with 2.6.15.4 UML kernels. Is it supposed not to work or is the option simply lacking in the