rebooting my system with idle=poll and profile=2 I get the following
profile while the UML instances are trying to startup (again a 60 second
sleep between start and end, this is somewhat longer then 60 seconds since
the machine is so bogged down)
CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 2605.96 MHz (esti
Hi,
I am trying to create a working version of uml on a 2.6.14.6 kernel. I
added the skas3 patch to the host kernel, compiled it, installed the
uml-utilities and then compiled the guest kernel after addeing the uml
patch. The linux binary is created alright but when I execute the uml,
it hangs (st
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Jeff Dike wrote:
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:27:39 -0500
From: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-user] what are the current limits on how many uml's on one
host?
On Mon, Mar 27
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:42:52PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> well, I reduced the count to 19 instances, and upped the ram on each one
> to 400M (they were hitting oom with only 256m each)
The UMLs were OOMing, not the host? And if you run one, it doesn't
OOM?
Make sure you have enough space in
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
David Lang wrote:
what could I do to assist in tracking down what is causing the contention?
Are you running a skas3-patched host kernel? You didn't mention if you were
running in 32bit mode. I don't believe there's a skas patch for 64bit
ke
David Lang wrote:
what could I do to assist in tracking down what is causing the contention?
Are you running a skas3-patched host kernel? You didn't mention if you
were running in 32bit mode. I don't believe there's a skas patch for
64bit kernels (yet). IMO, skas3 is required what you're a
yOn Mon, 27 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
I foolishly attempted to startup 25 uml instances on one system (dual 252
opterons with 8G of ram, each um instance getting 256M)
what I found was that they seem to be getting in each others way a LOT (just
on system boot), vmstat on the host is showing
On Friday 24 March 2006 18:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:34:01PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > The EIP is inside the stub code page, and the two pages are one near the
> > other.
> I think you're going to have to talk more slowly and use shorter words.
Yes, I've been a bit to
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:34, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
Hi again,
Quoting Daniel Tombeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I built a 2.6.16 from vanilla kernel.org sources and tried to migrate
my umls (Debian Sarge) to the new guest-kernel. But I can't get it
s
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:07, maheswar reddy wrote:
> hi
>
> i want 2 test router functionality by using VIRTUAL MACHINE concept.
> we need to run more thane 3 instanes of UML.
> can u suggest which version is better ?
> i am using RH linux 9.0 and kernel 2.4.4.20 and gcc 3.2.3 ?
Probably 2
On Sunday 26 March 2006 21:34, Daniel Tombeil wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Quoting Daniel Tombeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I built a 2.6.16 from vanilla kernel.org sources and tried to migrate
> > my umls (Debian Sarge) to the new guest-kernel. But I can't get it
>
> strange. It works fine wi
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:46:05PM +0530, Sundu wrote:
> Kernel panic: outer trampoline didn't exit with SIGKILL
This is an old, old bug which has long been fixed in more recent UMLs.
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email
hi
i want 2 test router functionality by using VIRTUAL MACHINE concept.
we need to run more thane 3 instanes of UML.
can u suggest which version is better ?
i am using RH linux 9.0 and kernel 2.4.4.20 and gcc 3.2.3 ?
pleasde help me
I foolishly attempted to startup 25 uml instances on one system (dual 252
opterons with 8G of ram, each um instance getting 256M)
what I found was that they seem to be getting in each others way a LOT
(just on system boot), vmstat on the host is showing almost all of the cpu
time (80%+) being
Hi,
Am using Redhat 9.0 (Kernel version: 2.4.20-8)I hv installed UML (kernel 2.4.20 & uml patch 2.4.20-1) in my PC
The procedure tat i followed was
1) root# cd ~/uml/ root# tar -xjvf linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2
2) root# cd ~/uml/linux-2.4.20 root# bzcat uml-patch-2.4.20-1.bz2 | patch -p1
3) root#
15 matches
Mail list logo