I downloaded a 2.4.21 kernel and the corresponding patch, when I try to
build the UML, I met the following problem.
make xconfig ARCH=um
make linux ARCH=um
.(lots of output here discarded, the following is error message)
make[4]: Entering directory
`/export/home/uml/linux-2.4.21/arch/um/ker
Blaisorblade schreef:
Thanks a lot for the fix. It indeed solves the problem. I had actually
also tried 2.6.15-bs3, but that gave me lot's of new TLS errors (and
things still weren't working), so it seemed even worse.
It was -bs3 or -bs1? -bs1 gave a lot of messages, but -bs3 not, and until now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
>> you get one big virtual ethernet network.
>
> That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and run
> uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See the
On Friday 10 March 2006 17:49, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
> tap device.
You can, but not the way you're trying.
> My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
> you get one big virtual e
On Friday 10 March 2006 17:35, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Blaisorblade schreef:
> > On Friday 10 March 2006 01:06, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> >>try
> >>
> >>rm -rf /lib/tls
> >
> > At most mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.away - 2.6.15-bs3 supports TLS, and 2.6.17
> > should include officially the suppor
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
> tap device. My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs
> are too, so you get one big virtual ethernet network.
I doubt it's possible, since each UML nee
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
tap device.
My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
you get one big virtual ethernet network.
I now get 'TUNSETIFF failed, errno = 16' when I try to get the second
UML to work though.
Blaisorblade schreef:
On Friday 10 March 2006 01:06, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
try
rm -rf /lib/tls
At most mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.away - 2.6.15-bs3 supports TLS, and 2.6.17 should
include officially the support.
Thanks a lot for the fix. It indeed solves the problem. I had actually
also tr
On Friday 10 March 2006 00:54, Louai Al-Awami wrote:
> Hi all,
> My UML has been running quit well for some time.
>
> I have recently made a java program of a moderate size.
>
> The program runs many threads and they keep sending and receiving
> information from the network
>
> But each time I use
On Friday 10 March 2006 12:34, Peter Methven wrote:
> Here are a few reasons I've found in the past that have stopped me pinging
> a virtual host from a physical host:
Could you avoid including unrelated mails in your answers?
You know, the netiquette, quote only what needed etc...
Your email weig
On Friday 10 March 2006 01:06, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> try
>
> rm -rf /lib/tls
At most mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.away - 2.6.15-bs3 supports TLS, and 2.6.17 should
include officially the support.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Bl
11 matches
Mail list logo
