On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:06PM -0500, Allen Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 22:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I tried upgrading my UML running 2.4.28-1um to 2.6.15.2-bs1. After
> > bringing the UML up under the later kernel, I noticed random
> > processes within the UML would segfaul
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 22:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried upgrading my UML running 2.4.28-1um to 2.6.15.2-bs1. After
> bringing the UML up under the later kernel, I noticed random
> processes within the UML would segfault. For instance, I tried
> SSHing to it over and over and in about 1
Resending, forgot to CC the list. Please excuse my dupe Blaisorblade.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:28:21PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> That's indeed harmless... but didn't the ssh log contain anything?
Nope. I was watching all syslog messages (all facilities, level debug and
higher) and no error
I'm forwarding the email to the ML since it's intended for that (and I've no
time to answer right now).
Btw, I think the problem is more likely to lie on port = 0 than on INADDR_ANY
(you'd at least need to be root to use a port < 1024, and I think port 0 is
invalid).
-- Forwarded Mess
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 21:04, Adam Atlas wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2006, at 12.57, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > If it's on the same subnet as the host one, simply remove that IP
> > from the
> > host and give it to the guest following the normal configuration
> > steps...
> >
> > If not, it can be accompli
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 04:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried upgrading my UML running 2.4.28-1um to 2.6.15.2-bs1. After bringing
> the UML up under the later kernel, I noticed random processes within the
> UML would segfault. For instance, I tried SSHing to it over and over and in
> abou
