On Wednesday 30 November 2005 12:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:11:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > -rc3 seems to work fine on Ubuntu.
>
> I guess your Ubuntu doesn't use NPTL. If it did, you'd see processes
> segfaulting occasionally.
>
> Jeff
It needs the tls patch. I
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike uttered the following:
> If the patchset were so excellent, it would be in mainline by now. It still
> needs work, even though it is correct AFAICT.
Merely the existence of the patchset is excellent :)
--
`Y'know, London's nice at this time of year. If you like yo
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:59:05PM +, Nix wrote:
> Yeah, sorry, I'm just using 2.6.14.3-bs1, which doesn't support
> NPTL. I'm aware that your excellent patchset will finally let
> me go NPTL-everywhere, which is great. :)
Just wanted to make clear that NPTL support exists...
If the patchset
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:11:14AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> -rc3 seems to work fine on Ubuntu.
I guess your Ubuntu doesn't use NPTL. If it did, you'd see processes
segfaulting occasionally.
Jeff
---
This SF
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 10:33, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:03:56AM +, Nix wrote:
> > There's actually two halves to this:
> >
> > - UML doesn't support NPTL in its guests, move /lib/tls away
>
> My current patchset is running NPTL just fine.
Does -rc3, or do patches nee
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike spake:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:03:56AM +, Nix wrote:
>> There's actually two halves to this:
>>
>> - UML doesn't support NPTL in its guests, move /lib/tls away
>
> My current patchset is running NPTL just fine.
Yeah, sorry, I'm just using 2.6.14.3-bs1, whi
That's a good suggestion.
My cron was running. I checked my crontab, and it was empty.
Now I've just stopped cron. I'm going to see if this helps.
Thanks for your reply.
Chip
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:48 PM
To:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 11:03:56AM +, Nix wrote:
> There's actually two halves to this:
>
> - UML doesn't support NPTL in its guests, move /lib/tls away
My current patchset is running NPTL just fine.
> - UML doesn't work if an NPTL glibc is used at all, run it with
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.3
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] announced authoritatively:
> Uff, it's the no. 1 UML FAQ - move /lib/tls away in the guest image, UML
> doesn't support NPTL (yet).
There's actually two halves to this:
- UML doesn't support NPTL in its guests, move /lib/tls away
- UML doesn't work if an N
