Re: [uml-user] error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function) in kernel 2.6.14.3

2005-11-29 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:28:13AM +0100, KLEIN St?phane wrote: > include/asm/processor.h:69: error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' > undeclared here (not in a function) mrproper the pool (or just delete it and recreate it) and then run defconfig before doing anything else.

[uml-user] error: `CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT' undeclared here (not in a function) in kernel 2.6.14.3

2005-11-29 Thread KLEIN Stéphane
Hello, I would like compile 2.6.14.3 kernel in UML mode. I do that : # make menuconfig ARCH=um # make ARCH=um It display that : """ In file included from include/asm/thread_info.h:17, from include/linux/thread_info.h:21, from include/linux/spinlock.h:53,

Re: [uml-user] Problems on x86_64 with 2.6.14 UML

2005-11-29 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 13:52, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:42:11PM +0200, Mihai Rusu wrote: > > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. > > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. > > Kernel panic - not syncing: get_skas_faultinfo : failed to wait for > > SIG

Re: [uml-user] Performance issue with 2.6.9

2005-11-29 Thread Gordon Russell
Any chance you still have cron running? It might kick in after an hour or so. On 29/11/05, Wang, Chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been experiencing some performance problems with my UML setup. > I had six guests running. The performance was very good immediately after > the boot.

[uml-user] Performance issue with 2.6.9

2005-11-29 Thread Wang, Chip
Hi,   I have been experiencing some performance problems with my UML setup. I had six guests running. The performance was very good immediately after the boot. However, if I leave them running for an hour or so, they all become very sluggish. Response to my typing in the virtual consoles bec

Re: [uml-user] Problems on x86_64 with 2.6.14 UML

2005-11-29 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:42:11PM +0200, Mihai Rusu wrote: > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. > Kernel panic - not syncing: get_skas_faultinfo : failed to wait for > SIGUSR1/SIGTRAP, pid = 19979, n = 19979, errno = 0, status = 0xb

[uml-user] Problems on x86_64 with 2.6.14 UML (attach)

2005-11-29 Thread Mihai Rusu
[whooops forgot about the attach] -- Mihai RUSU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG : http://dizzy.roedu.net/dizzy-gpg.txt WWW: http://dizzy.roedu.net "Linux is obsolete" -- AST # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux

[uml-user] Problems on x86_64 with 2.6.14 UML

2005-11-29 Thread Mihai Rusu
Hi there I am trying to compile and run a UML linux (as it comes with 2.6.14 vanilla sources) on a 2.6.14 x86_64 host kernel. First I have tried to build and run a 64 bit UML kernel (with a 64bit root image). Got this error: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root

Re: [uml-user] line_write_room: tty1: no room left in buffer

2005-11-29 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 28 November 2005 21:00, Christoph Bouvier wrote: > >>I don't exactly know what this message means but I suspect that it has > >>something to do with the UML kernel, > > > > exactly > > > > If you indeed see any problem apart from this (bogus) warning feel free > > to report, but otherwise

Re: [uml-user] uml session will not accept any input when started under umlgdb

2005-11-29 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:51, murthy andukuri wrote: > I came aross the perl script (ttyalloc ?))posted by > Jan "Bulb" Hudec on 2003-01-28 on the > user-mode-linux-devel forum. This script sets aside a > tty for umlgdb to use. This seems to have taken care > of the 'input' issues I have refer