Sorry, thought that would ensure compatibility, and hadn't seen
instructions to do otherwise. With defconfig, it's much snappier. Excellent.
Thanks again,
Ian
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:42:20AM -0500, Ian Smith-Heisters wrote:
Server listening on 10.1.200.150 port 22.
debug3
I've started packaging -bs kernels, and you'll . You will find binaries for
2.6.13.4-bs5 and 2.6.14-bs1.
This is the first attempt I've done, so please report if there is any problem.
Also the configuration is a first attempt, so report if you want changes -
it's based on defconfig with some tw
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:42:20AM -0500, Ian Smith-Heisters wrote:
> Server listening on 10.1.200.150 port 22.
> debug3: fd 4 is not O_NONBLOCK
> reexec socketpair: Address family not supported by protocol
On IRC yesterday, you said that the UML config was the same as the host,
as though that wer
Thanks, I've only ever compiled the kernel on debian-based systems.
make-kpkg abstracts these details away, and it totally slipped my mind.
Things are going spiffily now.
Thanks again,
Ian
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 04 November 2005 18:01, Ian Smith-Heisters wrote:
Okay, I solved my own
On Friday 04 November 2005 18:01, Ian Smith-Heisters wrote:
> Okay, I solved my own problem (well, I had help from a genius).
> Turns out UNIX sockets needed to be compiled into the guest kernel, not
> as a module.
> Which brings up another question. When I first booted the uml-guest I
> got a mo
> Which brings up another question. When I first booted the uml-guest I
> got a modules.dep does not exist error. The recommendation I read for
> dealing with this was to touch modules.dep, which certainly did get
> rid
> of the errors.
>
> However, is this problem indicative of further problem
Okay, I solved my own problem (well, I had help from a genius).
Turns out UNIX sockets needed to be compiled into the guest kernel, not
as a module.
Which brings up another question. When I first booted the uml-guest I
got a modules.dep does not exist error. The recommendation I read for
dea
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting SSHD to work in a UML guest. I've compiled
from kernel 2.6.12-686-smp under Ubuntu using the skas-v9-pre7 patch for
the host and bs11 for the guest. I've got networking setup using a
bridge on the host and tuntap. I can get a netcat connection from my
workst
> Do you want to run your uml on an LVM? That is what I do currently, I
> don't use files but instead start my UML with
> linux ubd0=/dev/rootvg/umllv
> works like a champ.
>
> Or are you asking if uml supports LVM itself, as in can you have a lvm
> setup inside your uml.
>
> --
> Jason
> The place
Do you want to run your uml on an LVM? That is what I do currently, I
don't use files but instead start my UML with
linux ubd0=/dev/rootvg/umllv
works like a champ.
Or are you asking if uml supports LVM itself, as in can you have a lvm
setup inside your uml.
--
Jason
The place where you made y
Hi,
On my new server, I want to LVM. Does UML support LVM partitions ?
Jean-Michel Caricand
Adresse professionnelle
GRETA de Besançon
35 avenue de Montrapon
25000 BESANCON
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.greta-besancon.com
Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
3615 L
11 matches
Mail list logo
