Re: [uml-user] UML guest silently exiting, doesn't boot

2005-08-28 Thread Gunter Ohrner
Am Sonntag, 28. August 2005 15:35 schrieben Sie: > > After retrying with an UML kernel build using UML's standard .config, > You are using something very different from the standard .config. Mh... That's pretty strange... I just made a mrproper in my 2.6.12.5 bs9 source tree and, just to be sure,

Re: [uml-user] Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.

2005-08-28 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, Am Sonntag, 28. August 2005 18:54 schrieb Clifford Ton: > Warning: unable to open an initial console. is /dev set up correctly? Is there a /dev/console and /dev/tty0? In the rootfs /dev directory do "./MAKEDEV console" and try it again. -- greetings eMHa pgpExnnt83vJu.pgp Description:

[uml-user] Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.

2005-08-28 Thread Clifford Ton
Host System 2.6.13-rc6, fedora 4.   Host/guest Kernel http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.12.5.tar.bz2   No Uml Patch   Will get the following message:, How can I fix it?     [EMAIL PROTECTED] umlbuild]# ./linux-uml-2.6.13-rc6 ubd0=./root-fs/gentoo-fs  mem=64M c

Re: [uml-user] UML guest silently exiting, doesn't boot

2005-08-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:19:06PM +0200, Gunter Ohrner wrote: > Host is Linux 2.6.12.2 vanilla x86_64, UML ist 2.6.12.5 with no UML specific > patches added. Use rc6 or rc7 - UML/x86_64 runs out of the box there. Jeff ---

Re: [uml-user] "Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap"

2005-08-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:11PM -0700, Clifford Ton wrote: > Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. > 0xe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () > (gdb) c > Continuing. > c > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x081c7aca in ipt_register_table (table=0x8229500, rep

Re: [uml-user] UML guest silently exiting, doesn't boot

2005-08-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 03:17:19AM +0200, Gunter Ohrner wrote: > After retrying with an UML kernel build using UML's standard .config, You are using something very different from the standard .config. > the > startup process went further but came to a grinding halt when trying to > mount the roo