[uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-18 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, i've now spend half a day to find out that the default MAC-address set by uml is FE:FD:00:00:00:00. That was the reason for my bad network connectivity to several umls on one host bridged the local network to the umls over tuntap. So if someone has ping problems to his two or more umls, try

[uml-user] 2.6.12.[35]-bs{7,11} boot failure

2005-08-18 Thread Nix
(Those are all the 2.6.12 UMLs I've tried.) Basically, userspace never starts: the last two lines I see are VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. line_ioctl: tty0: ioctl KDSIGACCEPT called [halt] (If I reboot into 2.6.11.9-bs5 with the same root fs, the next line I see is init's banner.)

[uml-user] Modules on-off - 2.6.10-5-386

2005-08-18 Thread Riccardo Bianconi
I'm tring to install uml on ubuntu with 2.6.10 kernel. If I made - make mrproper ARCH=um - make xconfig ARCH=um - load the defconfig file in arch/um --> remove module option <--- - make linux ARCH=um - strip linux Then I call "./linux ubd0=FSNAME" and UML seems to functions... but I haven't supp

[uml-user] Modules onoff - 2.6.10-5-386

2005-08-18 Thread Riccardo Bianconi
I'm tring to install uml on ubuntu with 2.6.10 kernel. If I made - make mrproper - make xconfig ARCH=um - load the defconfig file in arch/um --> remove module option <--- - make linux ARCH=um - strip linux Then I call "./linux ubd0=FSNAME" and UML seems to functions... but I haven't support for

[Fwd: Re: [uml-user] CPU time]

2005-08-18 Thread Jean-Michel Caricand
--- Begin Message --- Jason Clark a écrit : Search the mailing lists for cpucap. I had reposted a patch that someone else had done that would apply to 2.6.8 I believe that actually limits the % of CPU that a process can use and not just the time it can be running. Buggy, no guarentees, not

Re: [uml-user] CPU time

2005-08-18 Thread Jean-Michel Caricand
Jason Clark a écrit : Search the mailing lists for cpucap. I had reposted a patch that someone else had done that would apply to 2.6.8 I believe that actually limits the % of CPU that a process can use and not just the time it can be running. Buggy, no guarentees, not supported and I can't e