Re: [uml-user] Problem: no more processes left in this runlevel

2005-06-01 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 06:05 schrieb Dinesh Ahuja: > I am working on Red Hat linux 8.0 and installed an > build the UML kernel, but facing below problem while > booting up UML Kernel. > INIT: Id "c1" respawning too > fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "c2" respawning too fast: disabl

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 07:48 schrieb Jean-Michel Caricand: > Jeff Dike a écrit : > >On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > >>[pid 1537] --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- > >Looks like tls, move /lib/tls out of the way. > That work! I am surprised b

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Jean-Michel Caricand
Jeff Dike a écrit : On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: [pid 1537] --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- Looks like tls, move /lib/tls out of the way. Jeff

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > [pid 1537] --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- Looks like tls, move /lib/tls out of the way. Jeff --- This SF.Net email is sponso

[uml-user] Problem: no more processes left in this runlevel

2005-06-01 Thread Dinesh Ahuja
Hi All, I am working on Red Hat linux 8.0 and installed an build the UML kernel, but facing below problem while booting up UML Kernel. INIT: Id "c1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: Id "c2" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes INIT: no more processes left in this runleve

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Jean-Michel Caricand
Blaisorblade a écrit : On Wednesday 01 June 2005 08:50, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: Jeff Dike a écrit : On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: # strace ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a completely different problem: Is it correct that it looks

Re: [uml-user] uml differences on the same root_fs (ssh, nslookup, pam, ..)

2005-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 17:33, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2005 17:20 schrieben Sie: > > On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:46, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > > > i've a problem in my uml: booted with kernel linux-2.4.19-5 > > > (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/dl-sf.html)

Re: [uml-user] uml differences on the same root_fs (ssh, nslookup, pam, ..)

2005-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:46, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > Hi, > > i've a problem in my uml: booted with kernel linux-2.4.19-5 > (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/dl-sf.html) ssh connects to the uml > work. nslookup work. (the working uml) > booted with my own compiled linux-2.6.11.11 ssh

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 08:50, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > Jeff Dike a écrit : > >On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > # strace ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a completely different problem: Is it correct that it looks there for libraries? > open("/home/jm/ACE_wrap

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

2005-06-01 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 08:50:23AM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > I send to you strace output. Did you notice that I said to strace sshd? Jeff --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo